Master protocol · published in full
The Dicoias Method — set down here in full, for anyone to use. Nothing here is medical advice.
Master protocol — parenteral-grade propolis extraction. Integrating the Sosnowski cold-purification framework with optimized pH-shift extraction and silibinin-derived prodrug esterification. Batch size: 500 g raw propolis (Poplar-type, HPLC-verified). Target: sterile lyophilized injectable cake — water-soluble disodium succinate salt. Version 3.0 · August 2026.
Derived from: Sosnowski US 4,382,886 (1983); Legalon® SIL (Rottapharm/Madaus); FAO propolis processing guidelines; and contemporary optimization literature on flavonoid/phenolic acid extraction.
Section 1
This protocol synthesizes three established pharmaceutical approaches into a single, unified workflow:
The foundational insight: propolis waxes and high-MW resins precipitate at low temperature (−20 °C) in ethanolic solution, while flavonoids and phenolic acids remain dissolved. This yields a clear, essentially colourless, non-staining filtrate free of emboligenic waxes. The Sosnowski protocol builds on Russian prior art (USSR Pat. 232470, 267014, 576115, 585846) and represents the only documented route to a parenteral-grade propolis starting material.
Different compound classes extract optimally under different conditions. Non-polar flavonoids (pinocembrin, chrysin, galangin) prefer high ethanol concentration (85%) with mild acidification (pH 3, citric acid). Polar phenolic acids (CAPE, caffeic acid, ferulic acid) prefer lower ethanol (23%) with mild alkalinity (pH 8, NaHCO3). A sequential two-step extraction captures both fractions at their respective optima without thermal degradation.
Propolis flavonoids are phenolic acids — they possess no basic nitrogen for hydrochloride salt formation. Instead, succinic anhydride covalently esterifies phenolic –OH groups to hemisuccinates, appending free carboxylic acid handles. Neutralization with NaOH yields the water-soluble disodium salt. This is the only established chemistry for converting phenolic plant extracts into parenteral formulations.
Section 2
| Equipment | Specification | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Cryomill / mortar | Liquid argon-cooled | Comminution of frozen propolis |
| Stainless steel sieve | 1 mm mesh | Particle size control |
| Jacketed extraction vessel | 5 L, amber glass, argon inlet | Two-step maceration with temp control |
| Magnetic stirrer + hotplate | 0–600 rpm, 20–100 °C | Continuous agitation, temperature control |
| pH meter | ±0.01 accuracy, calibrated | pH monitoring during extraction and neutralization |
| Deep-freeze / ultra-low freezer | −20 °C to −80 °C | Sosnowski cold precipitation + stress test |
| Cold filtration apparatus | Büchner funnel, jacketed, vacuum | −20 °C filtration without warming |
| Whatman No. 50 paper | Hard-grade, quantitative, 2.7 µm | Primary cold filtration |
| Whatman No. 1 paper | Qualitative, 11 µm | Pre-filtration / clarification |
| Thin-film evaporator | ≤50 mbar, 35–40 °C jacket | Bulk ethanol removal (gentle) |
| OR: Lyochrysalis (evap mode) | Cryolapse −110 °C, vacuum only | Alternative: vacuum evaporation with cold trap |
| Three-neck RBF | 2 L, borosilicate, magnetic stir | Esterification reactor |
| Oil bath | 30–80 °C, ±1 °C stability | Heating for esterification |
| Separatory funnel | 4 L, borosilicate | Liquid–liquid extraction workup |
| Rotary evaporator | ≤40 °C, ≤50 mbar | Solvent removal from workup |
| 0.45 µm PES filter | 47 mm, sterile | Pre-filtration before sterile filter |
| 0.22 µm PES filter | 47 mm, sterile, pharma grade | Sterile filtration |
| Lyophilizer | Lyochrysalis or equivalent | Final drying to sterile cake |
| Lyoprester™ cartridge line | Dual-chamber, bypass, plunger-set | Filling, sealing under vacuum, and the reconstitution architecture itself |
| ISO Class 5 hood / isolator | Laminar flow, HEPA-filtered | Aseptic filling and filtration |
| Karl Fischer titrator | Coulometric | Residual moisture verification |
| HPLC-DAD / LC-MS | Analytical grade | Identity and purity verification |
| LAL test kit | USP <85> compliant | Endotoxin testing |
Section 3 · Phase I
Yield: ~480–490 g fine propolis powder. Storage: keep at −20 °C in amber glass container under argon until use (≤7 days).
Section 4 · Phase II
This is the critical yield-maximization phase. Two sequential extractions are performed on the SAME propolis powder — first for non-polar flavonoids (acidic, high ethanol), then for polar phenolic acids (mild alkaline, low ethanol). The combined extract is then processed as a single batch.
| Chemical | Qty | CAS | Grade | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol, absolute (≥99.5%) | 2.5 L | 64-17-5 | Pharma | Primary solvent |
| Citric acid monohydrate | 8 g | 5949-29-1 | ACS | Acidifier (Step 1, pH 3) |
| Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) | 15 g | 144-55-8 | ACS | Alkalizer (Step 2, pH 8) |
| Argon gas | 1 cylinder | 7440-37-1 | ≥99.9% | Inert atmosphere |
| Deionized water | 2 L | 7732-18-5 | Type I | Diluent for ethanol |
Target compounds: pinocembrin, chrysin, galangin, pinobanksin (non-polar flavonoids).
Target compounds: CAPE, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid (polar phenolic acids).
CRITICAL: pH > 8.5 causes flavonoid ring-opening and degradation. If pH > 8.3, add 1 M citric acid dropwise to bring back to 8.0.
Expected dissolved solids: ~180–220 g (combined yield from both steps).
Section 5 · Phase III
Primary sourceReference: Sosnowski Z.M., Method for Extracting Propolis and Water Soluble Dry Propolis Powder, US Patent 4,382,886 (May 10, 1983). Building on Russian prior art: USSR Pat. 232470, 267014, 576115, 585846.
Principle: In ethanolic solution, propolis waxes (long-chain hydrocarbons, esters, fatty acids) and high-MW resins have inverse temperature solubility. At −20 °C, they precipitate as a viscous, opaque mass, while flavonoids and phenolic acids remain in solution. Cold filtration yields a clear, essentially colourless, non-staining filtrate free of emboligenic wax particles.
Yield: ~2.8 L clear, wax-free propolis extract. Mass of dissolved solids: ~150–180 g (wax fraction removed: ~30–50 g).
Section 6 · Phase IV
Objective: remove bulk ethanol and water to obtain a purified propolis resin substrate for esterification. Constraint: temperature must not exceed 40 °C to prevent thermal degradation of CAPE and flavonoids.
Time: ~2–3 hours.
SAFETY: Ethanol vapor + vacuum pump oil = fire/explosion risk. Purge chamber with argon. Ensure exhaust ventilation to fume hood.
Time: ~6–8 hours.
Result: the purified yellowish bed, ethanol-free, ready for esterification.
Section 7 · Phase V
Primary sourceReference: Legalon® SIL (silibinin-C-2′,3-dihydrogen succinate, disodium salt) — Rottapharm/Madaus. Approved IV formulation for Amanita phalloides poisoning.
Chemistry: propolis flavonoids are phenolic acids. They possess no basic nitrogen for HCl salt formation. Succinic anhydride covalently esterifies phenolic –OH groups to hemisuccinates, appending free carboxylic acid handles. The flavonoid chromone ring system remains intact.
| Parameter | Value | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Purified propolis solid (yellowish bed) | 165 g | Mid-range from Phase IV |
| Estimated phenolic content | ~82.5 g (50% w/w) | HPLC: flavonoids + phenolic acids |
| Average phenolic MW | ~270 g/mol | Weighted: pinocembrin (256), chrysin (254), galangin (270), CAPE (284) |
| Moles phenolic core | ~0.306 mol | 82.5 g ÷ 270 g/mol |
| Avg phenolic –OH per molecule | ~2.5 | Pinocembrin: 2; chrysin: 2; galangin: 3; CAPE: 2 |
| Total phenolic –OH | ~0.765 mol | 0.306 mol × 2.5 |
| Succinic anhydride (SA) | ~0.956 mol | 1.25 eq per –OH |
| SA mass | ~95.7 g | 0.956 mol × 100.07 g/mol |
| DMAP catalyst | ~0.031 mol | 0.1 eq per phenolic core |
| DMAP mass | ~3.8 g | 0.031 mol × 122.17 g/mol |
| Pyridine (anhydrous) | ~500 mL | Solvent + base, ~3× resin mass |
| Chemical | Qty for batch | CAS No. | Supplier grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Succinic anhydride | 100 g | 108-30-5 | ACS, ≥99% |
| 4-Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) | 4.0 g | 1122-58-3 | ACS, ≥99% |
| Pyridine, anhydrous | 600 mL | 110-86-1 | ≥99.8%, H2O ≤0.01% |
| Argon gas | 1 cylinder | 7440-37-1 | ≥99.9%, pharma grade |
CRITICAL SAFETY: All operations under inert argon atmosphere. Pyridine is toxic (TLV 5 ppm) and flammable (flash point 20 °C). Perform in fume hood with spark-proof equipment. DMAP is a potent skin sensitizer. Use nitrile gloves and face shield.
Section 8 · Phase VI
The hemisuccinate product carries free terminal carboxylic acid groups (–COOH). Neutralization with NaOH deprotonates these to carboxylate anions (–COO−Na+), conferring water solubility. This is the same mechanism as Legalon® SIL.
| Chemical | Quantity | Specification | CAS No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemisuccinate reaction mixture | All from Phase V | In pyridine solution | — |
| Hydrochloric acid (conc., 37%) | ~120 mL | ACS grade | 7647-01-0 |
| Ethyl acetate | 2.0 L | ≥99.5%, HPLC grade | 141-78-6 |
| Sodium hydroxide pellets | 50 g | ≥98%, ACS grade | 1310-73-2 |
| Water for Injection (WFI) | 3 L | USP/EP grade, pyrogen-free | 7732-18-5 |
| Ethanol (96%) | 600 mL | Pharma grade | 64-17-5 |
| Anhydrous MgSO4 | 80 g | Drying agent | 7487-88-9 |
| Sodium chloride | 300 g | ACS grade | 7647-14-5 |
| Sodium bicarbonate (sat. soln) | 500 mL | ACS grade | 144-55-8 |
CRITICAL: Do NOT exceed pH 8.0. Phenolic compounds oxidize rapidly in alkaline conditions >pH 9. If pH overshoots to >8.0, immediately add 0.1 M HCl dropwise to bring back to 7.4.
Section 9 · Phase VII
Objective: remove particulates and bioburden. Note: 0.22 µm filtration removes bacteria and particles but does NOT remove endotoxins (LPS, 1–10 nm). Endotoxin levels must be verified separately by LAL test (USP <85>).
Acceptance: sterile (no growth); endotoxins <5 EU/kg body weight; pH 7.2–7.6.
Section 10 · Phase VIII
Objective: convert sterile aqueous solution into a stable, solid cake for long-term storage and IV reconstitution. The Lyochrysalis platform is fully engaged here — TgShift, LyoLevit, and Cryolapse are used for an aqueous peptide-like phenolic salt matrix.
Yield: ~150 sealed Lyoprester cartridges. Each carries ~1.0 g of sterile lyophilised cake (equivalent to ~600 mg propolis flavonoid succinate sodium salt) with its reconstitution volume already loaded in the adjacent chamber.
Section 11 · Phase IX
Nothing is drawn up, and nothing is injected into a vial. The cartridge already holds both phases; reconstitution is an actuation of the cartridge, performed in the closed system.
Section 12
| Item | Qty | CAS / code | Grade / notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Propolis, raw (Poplar-type) | 500 g | — | HPLC-verified, ≤8% moisture |
| Ethanol, absolute (≥99.5%) | 3.0 L | 64-17-5 | Pharma grade, ≤0.02% H2O |
| Ethanol, 96% | 1.5 L | 64-17-5 | Pharma grade |
| Ethyl acetate | 2.5 L | 141-78-6 | HPLC grade |
| Pyridine, anhydrous | 600 mL | 110-86-1 | ≥99.8%, H2O ≤0.01% |
| Water for Injection (WFI) | 15 L | 7732-18-5 | USP/EP, pyrogen-free |
| Deionized water (Type I) | 3 L | 7732-18-5 | ≥18 MΩ·cm |
| Sodium chloride | 500 g | 7647-14-5 | ACS grade |
| Item | Qty | CAS | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Succinic anhydride | 100 g | 108-30-5 | ACS, ≥99% |
| 4-Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) | 4.0 g | 1122-58-3 | ACS, ≥99% |
| Sodium hydroxide pellets | 50 g | 1310-73-2 | ≥98%, ACS |
| Hydrochloric acid (conc., 37%) | 150 mL | 7647-01-0 | ACS grade |
| Citric acid monohydrate | 10 g | 5949-29-1 | ACS, ≥99.5% |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 20 g | 144-55-8 | ACS, ≥99% |
| Anhydrous MgSO4 | 100 g | 7487-88-9 | Drying agent, powder |
| Argon gas | 1 cylinder | 7440-37-1 | ≥99.9%, pharma |
| Item | Qty | Specification |
|---|---|---|
| Whatman No. 1 filter paper | 2 boxes (200 sheets) | 11 µm, qualitative |
| Whatman No. 50 filter paper | 2 boxes (200 sheets) | 2.7 µm, quantitative, hard-grade |
| 0.45 µm PES membrane | 20 units | 47 mm, sterile |
| 0.22 µm PES membrane | 20 units | 47 mm, sterile, pharma grade |
| Lyoprester™ dual-chamber cartridges | 200 units | Type I glass, product + diluent chamber, bypass |
| Cartridge plungers / closures | 400 units | Bromobutyl, cartridge grade |
| Nitrile gloves | 2 boxes | Chemical resistant |
| Face shield | 2 units | Splash resistant |
Section 13
All quantities expressed in molar (M), millimolar (mM), micromolar (µM), and nanomolar (nM) for standardization and scale-up calculations.
| Component | Mol | mM | µM | nM | Eq ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenolic –OH (total) | 0.765 | 765 | 765,000 | 765,000,000 | 1.0 (baseline) |
| Succinic anhydride | 0.956 | 956 | 956,000 | 956,000,000 | 1.25 per –OH |
| DMAP | 0.031 | 31 | 31,000 | 31,000,000 | 0.04 per –OH |
| NaOH (neutralization) | ~0.450 | ~450 | ~450,000 | ~450,000,000 | ~0.59 per –OH* |
| Propolis flavonoid core | 0.306 | 306 | 306,000 | 306,000,000 | 0.4 per –OH |
* NaOH equivalence is lower than SA because not all carboxylic acid groups require full neutralization to achieve pH 7.4; some phenolic groups remain partially protonated or are sterically hindered. The excess SA (1.25 eq) ensures complete esterification despite steric hindrance on galangin (3 –OH groups).
Section 14
This section details every thermal, chemical, and oxidative risk point in the protocol, with exact temperature ceilings, pH boundaries, and mitigation strategies.
| Process step | Risk | Damage threshold | Mitigation | Operating window |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1: Maceration (acidic) | Oxidation of CAPE/flavonoids | Air exposure >24 h | Argon blanket, sealed vessel | Argon atmosphere, RT, 72 h |
| Step 1: Maceration (acidic) | Thermal degradation | >70 °C | Jacketed vessel at 46 °C | 46 ± 1 °C |
| Step 2: Maceration (alkaline) | Flavonoid ring-opening | pH > 8.5 | Strict pH monitoring | pH 7.8–8.2 |
| Step 2: Maceration (alkaline) | Thermal degradation | >70 °C | Jacketed vessel at 41 °C | 41 ± 1 °C |
| Phase III: Cold filtration | Wax emulsification | Agitation during freezing | Static freezing, no disturbance | −20 °C, static, 24 h |
| Phase IV: Solvent removal | CAPE oxidation | >50 °C under vacuum | Thin-film evap ≤38 °C | 35–38 °C, ≤30 mbar |
| Phase V: Esterification | Pyridine hydrolysis of SA | H2O in pyridine >0.1% | Anhydrous pyridine, molecular sieves | H2O ≤0.01% |
| Phase V: Esterification | Over-esterification | >60 °C, >16 h | Temp control 52 °C, TLC monitoring | 52 ± 1 °C, 10–12 h |
| Phase VI: HCl quench | CAPE acid hydrolysis | pH <1, temp >20 °C | Ice-cold 0.1 M HCl, immediate workup | 0.1 M HCl, ≤20 °C, <5 min |
| Phase VI: NaOH neutralization | Phenolic oxidation | pH >9 | pH meter, titrate slowly | pH 7.2–7.6 |
| Phase VIII: Lyophilization | Cake collapse | T > Tg′ | TgShift RF modulation | TgShift at −35 °C |
Propolis flavonoids are phenolic acids (pKa ~7–10 for phenolic –OH; pKa ~4–5 for carboxylic acids in CAPE). They possess no basic nitrogen (no tertiary amine). Adding HCl to a phenol merely protonates the aromatic hydroxyl, which reduces water solubility and promotes precipitation. Hydrochloride salt formation is only possible for basic alkaloids (e.g., morphine, which has a pyridine-like nitrogen at pKa ~8). The succinate ester route is the only established chemistry for phenolic plant extracts destined for IV administration.
The Sosnowski patent specifies −20 °C for processing and uses −70 °C only as a purity checkpoint. Processing at −80 °C is avoided for the process itself because: (1) ethanol viscosity increases dramatically, impeding filtration; (2) Whatman No. 50 paper becomes brittle and tears; (3) some flavonoids may co-precipitate with waxes. The two-stage approach (−20 °C processing + −80 °C stress test) provides complete wax removal without flavonoid loss.
Section 15
| Test | Method | Acceptance criteria | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity (flavonoid profile) | HPLC-DAD / LC-MS | Match reference standard | Every batch |
| Degree of esterification | 1H-NMR (succinate protons at ~2.5 ppm) | ≥70% phenolic –OH converted | Every batch |
| Water solubility | Visual / turbidimetry | Clear solution at 60 mg/mL | Every batch |
| pH (reconstituted) | Potentiometry | 7.2–7.6 | Every batch |
| Sterility | USP <71> | No growth | Every batch |
| Endotoxins | LAL (USP <85>) | <5 EU/kg body weight | Every batch |
| Residual ethanol | GC-Headspace (ICH Q3C) | ≤0.5% | Every batch |
| Residual pyridine | GC-Headspace (ICH Q3C) | ≤0.02% | Every batch |
| Residual moisture | Karl Fischer | ≤2% | Every batch |
| Particulate matter | USP <788> | ≥10 µm: ≤6000/cartridge; ≥25 µm: ≤600/cartridge | Every batch |
| Heavy metals | ICP-MS | Pb ≤10 ppm; Cd ≤1 ppm; As ≤2 ppm; Hg ≤1 ppm | Every 3 batches |
| Propolis origin verification | HPLC fingerprinting | Poplar-type marker compounds present | Every batch |
The Dicoias Method — set down here in full, for anyone to use. Nothing here is medical advice.
Primary sourceDocument compiled from: Sosnowski Z.M. US 4,382,886 (1983); Legalon® SIL prescribing information (Rottapharm/Madaus); FAO Propolis Processing Guidelines; and contemporary peer-reviewed literature on flavonoid extraction optimization (2020–2025). The unified protocol integrating them — the pH-shift two-step extraction, the cold-purification staging, the succinate prodrug application to propolis, the Lyochrysalis drying programme and the dual-chamber presentation — is the Dicoias method, developed at Panacea Bio Chem Ltd.
The science behind each stage of this protocol is explained on the propolis extraction science page; the chemistry of the compounds it recovers is on the main pinocembrin resource and the pinocembrin vs chrysin comparison.
Continue